|
WHAT I’VE BEEN READING…
|
|
|
|
|
“Diary”
Chuck Palahniuk
|
Diary is a pretty
good slice of dark comedy from Chuck Palahniuk. The book is written as
a ‘coma diary’ kept by a housewife on ‘Waytansea Island’. As the book
progresses, it turns out that the author of the diary has a dark
destiny to fulfill. Perhaps I was not in the right mood for this book,
but I found it somewhat more forced than the previous Palahniuk books
that I have read.
6/10
|
|
“Civil
Disobedience and Other Essays”
Henry David
Thoreau
|
This collection
of Thoreau’s essays included: ‘On the Duty of Civil
Disobedience’, ‘Life without Principle’, ‘Slavery in Massachusetts’, ‘A
Plea for Captain John Brown’ and ‘Walking’. While I like Thoreau’s
perspective on issues such as slavery, civil disobedience and
conservation, I couldn’t help but feel that Thoreau enjoyed a
privileged position that allowed him to come to these positions more
easily than his contemporaries. Who might become a conservationist if
they could walk for four hours every day? Who else might not pay their
taxes on principle if they would spend only a single night in jail? So
while I like Thoreau, I do not consider him a heroic character. 7/10
|
|
“Candide”
Voltaire
|
In the
allegorical story of Candide, Voltaire makes an all-out attack on the concept
of Liebnizian optimism, which argues that this world is the best of all
possible worlds and thus everything that happens is for the best, but
Voltaire does not limit his assault to the philosophers, also arguing
that governments and theologians have equally little to offer the
common man, something I agree with wholeheartedly. When it comes to any
ideology, as the book says: “All that is very well, but let us tend the
garden”, perhaps I should read more enlightenment philosophy. 9/10
|
|
“The Dead Man in
the Bunker”
Martin Pollack
|
In this book,
Pollack dispassionately analyses the evolution of German nationalism in
Austria from the late 19th century to the end of the 2nd
World War. What makes this book special is that the author unflinchingly
faces his families own history as ardent Nazis. I would recommend this
book to anyone who would like insight into how normal people can,
through a number of misdirected steps, end up committing evil acts. For
me, the book reaffirmed an existing aversion to any kind of
nationalism, or fundamentalist political beliefs. 10/10
|
|
“Only in America”
Matt Fry
|
In ‘Only in America’, Matt Fry attempts to provide insight into the American Experience from the
perspective of a long-term visitor. Having lived in America for a short time, I appreciated the attempt by the author to move beyond the common
stereo-types of that exist in Europe, and overall, Fry’s account is
entertaining and well written. For me, where he fails is in separating
himself from the ‘inside-the-beltway’ bubble, which ironically is
something he talks specifically about. In particular I found the
depiction of think tank cretins as rogue geniuses particularly irksome
given that many of the ideas of those interviewed have been proven idiotic. 6/10
|
|
“Armageddon
in Retrospect”
Kurt Vonnegut
|
This posthumously
published collection of essays and short stories was released on the
first anniversary of Kurt Vonnegut’s death. Many of the short-stories
focus on the World War Two and are clearly inspired by Vonnegut’s time
as a prisoner of war in Dresden, which is fitting. Overall, this is a
really good book and much better than the last book of short Vonnegut
stories that I read: ‘Welcome to the Monkey House’. 8/10
|
|
“The Birth of
Tragedy from the Spirit of Music”
Friedrich
Nietzsche
|
The ‘birth of
tragedy’ examines the role of Apollonian (logical) and Dionysian
(emotional) influences in Greek tragedy. After a long break, I was
looking forward to reading some philosophy again, but I never really
got into ‘The Birth of Tragedy’ because Nietzsche does not attempt to
justify his characterization of Greek theater in much depth. By the end
of the book, I was left wondering whether people are persuaded to agree
with Nietzsche based only on his beautiful writing style. 6/10
|
|
“The Jefferson Bible”
Thomas
Jefferson
|
In this version
of the New Testament, Thomas Jefferson attempts to remove all
miraculous and supernatural elements of the Christian Bible, reducing
it to a work of philosophy, which Jefferson found more compatible with
his Deistic beliefs. While I found this to be an interesting
experiment, unlike Jefferson, I do not find the resulting philosophy to
be especially great or enlightening. Nevertheless, the way in which Jefferson was able to integrate aspects of Christianity into his personal philosophy
provides a lesson in how free thinkers can learn from religious texts. 7/10
|
|
“A Cook’s Tour”
Anthony
Bourdain
|
A Cook’s tour is
a frank and colorful travel book in which Bourdain explores the world
through its various local cuisines. Like any good travel book, A Cook’s
Tour leaves one with the urge to visit the countries covered and, in
this case, to eat ones around said countries. The only down-side is
that Bourdain’s commentary can be a little narcissistic and
self-obsessed, but I suppose that is true of all bon vivants. 8/10
|
|
“Palm Sunday”
Kurt Vonnegut
|
In Kurt
Vonnegut’s own words, this book is an ‘Autobiographical Collage’ of the
author’s letters, speeches and essays that is tied together with a
pleasant and off-beat narrative. If like me you are a Vonnegut fan and
want to know more about what drives his writing, Palm Sunday is very
entertaining. However, I suspect this may be a little dry for those who
are not already Vonnegut fans. 8/10
|
|
“Welcome to the
Monkey House”
Kurt Vonnegut
|
This is a
collection of Kurt Vonnegut’s short stories, primarily from his early
career and before his breakthrough with Slaughterhouse Five. This is
probably the weakest Vonnegut book that I have read, but is enjoyable
nonetheless. 6/10
|
|
“The Selfish
Genius: How Richard Dawkins Rewrote Darwin's Legacy”
Fern
Elsdon-Baker
|
This book was a
little strange. The cover advertised the book as anti-Dawkins, but it
really wasn’t that at All. Elsdon’s main points were two-fold: firstly
that there remain some things that neo-Darwinism does not explain
neatly and secondly that Dawkins’ aggressive pursuit of truth may be
counter productive for some audiences. On the first point, I found
Elsdon’s arguments unconvincing and occasionally, though I am a lay
man, she seemed confused about the science. The second point I have no
time for - I think there is no room for relativism in science. 4/10
|
|
“Three Cups of
Tea”
Greg Mortinson
and David Relin
|
Three Cups of Tea
is an amazing true story that begins with Greg Mortinson’s failed
attempt to conquer K2. After recuperating in a Balti village in tribal Pakistan, Mortinson promised to return and build a school for the impoverished villagers
that nursed him back to health. Despite a complete lack of experience
and financial resources, Mortinson did this and much more, returning to
tribal Pakistan again and again to build tens of schools for his
charity the Central Asia Institute. This is the kind of story that
makes one want to do more charity work in their own lives, which I’m sure
is one of the reasons for writing this book. 910
|
|
“Gimme Something
Better”
Jack Boulware
and Silke Tudor
|
Gimme Something
Better is an oral history of bay area punk, from 70s proto-punk through
the Dead Kennedys, NOFX to million-selling bands like Green Day. The
oral history format is well chosen, with conflicting accounts and
opinions presented side-by-side, and it all adds to the book. If like
me, you’re a California p unk fan, then this is an essential book. I
just wish it covered the LA scene and bands like Bad Religion and the
Vandals. 8/10
|
|
“New Rules”
Bill Maher
|
This is a
compendium presented in A-Z fashion of the best of Bill Maher’s ‘New
Rules’ segments from his show ‘Real Time’ on HBO. While Bill’s New Rules
are funny in part, it is a fairly lazy reproduction of material from
the show. 5/10
|
|
“A History of
God”
Karen Armstrong
|
Karen Armstrong
is a former Catholic nun and religious scholar. ‘A History of God’
provides a detailed account of the emergence and evolution of
monotheistic religions, from Judaism, through Christianity, Islam and
Sikhism and the many and various sects thereof. Armstrong truly excels
in drawing out the common threads that unite religions and exploring
the cyclical swings between ‘rationalist’ and ‘mystic’ religious
experiences. As a committed atheist I found nothing to inspire belief
in the history of the religions. If anything, the torturous attempts of
successive generations to reconcile the irreconcilable, reaffirms my
atheism. 10/10
|
|
“Atlas Shrugged”
Ayn Rand
|
Ayn Rand is a
pillar of modern free-market conservatism and Atlas Shrugged is
considered her magnum opus. Rand uses this novel as a vehicle to explore
her ‘objectivist’ philosophy. Unfortunately, I think that the whole is
smaller than the sum of its parts. The supporting story does not
provide a rigorous analysis of objectivism and conversely,
philosophical argument makes the dialogue in Atlas Shrugged positively
painful. The final result is mediocrity. In terms of philosophy, I like
the objectivist focus on reason, disdain for mysticism and view that
the fulfillment of one’s potential is a moral imperative. Where I part
ways with the objectivists, is that I see no reason that these
principles cannot be respected in a society with a strong but
constitutional government that provides a safety net for those citizens
who cannot take care of themselves. When practiced, either extreme of
collectivism or individualism has resulted in disaster. 6/10
|
|
“Arguing with
Idiots”
Glenn Beck
|
‘Arguing with
Idiots’ is red meat for Glenn Beck’s television and radio audience. In
large part the book promotes a corporatist agenda. Beck attempts to
provide cover for this with straw man ‘common sense’ arguments and
selective claims to libertarianism. The book is in turns ignorant,
arrogant, deceitful and hilarious, just like Beck’s television show. I
am coming to the conclusion that Beck is the P.T. Barnum of television
pundits – a great showman who cares nothing for the contents of his
arguments. 4/10
|
|
“The Greatest
Show
on Earth”
Richard Dawkins
|
Unlike previous
books by Richard Dawkins, ‘The Greatest Show on Earth’ is a direct
repost to those who advocate creationism and intelligent design. While
this book adds to Dawkin’s previous popular science books on evolution,
I enjoyed it less due to the time spent defending against ideas which
are, at best, laughable. 8/10
|
|
“Lord of the
Flies”
William Golding
|
I think that Lord
of the Flies is the first Nobel Prize winning book that I’ve read, and
I enjoyed it in much the same way that I enjoy the rich atmosphere and
well drawn characters of a Ray Bradbury novel, however, like a Bradbury
novel, I found Lord of the Flies very straight-forward. The meaning is
right there on the surface, and for some reason it is somehow less
satisfying. That being said, the book has great pace and a wonderful
and nail-biting finish. 7/10
|
|
“Angler: The
Shadow Vice-Presidency of Dick Cheney”
Barton Gellman
|
Barton Gellman’s
well researched book on Dick Cheney is a lesson in how to write an
entertaining and informative biography. Gellman treats his subject with
a lot of respect, but paints the picture of a man who has
catastrophically lost his way. Indisputably intelligent, hard-working
and principled, Cheney has a single-minded obsession with defending the
power of the executive branch and a total disregard for politics or
public opinion. Unfortunately, the executive team which Cheney freed to
act without oversight were incompetent (Bush, Gonzales, Rumsfeld
and Brown), aggressive (Addington, Yoo and Bolton), weak
(Ashcroft, Rice) and dangerously idealistic (Wolfowitz, Pearle).
10/10
|
|
“The Invisible
Man”
H.G. Wells
|
Each of H.G.
Well’s science fiction books examines a different element of the human
condition. In the Invisible Man, Wells tells the story of a scientist
turned invisible and thus torn out of society by his own invention. As
the story progresses Wells deftly reveals that anonymity did not turn
the invisible man evil, it merely freed him to act according to his
true nature. 9/10
|
|
“The Qur’an, a
Biography”
Bruce Lawrence
|
This is a pretty
good overview of the Qur’an, the historical context in which it
emerged, the prophet Mohammad and various historical interpretations of
the text. I found the Sufi and Whirling Dervish interpretations to be
most compatible with a Neo-Darwinian / atheistic philosophy, because of
the wonder that Sufi’s find in the natural world. It was also very
interesting to see how successful Muslim thinkers have been at
integrating their faith with Science. 7/10
|
|
“The Selfish
Gene”
Richard Dawkins
|
The selfish gene
provides an excellent overview of Neo-Darwinian theory, and argues
convincingly for individual, ‘selfish’ genes as the unit of biological
natural selection (as opposed to organism selection or group
selection). Seeing the world through this prism, it becomes clear that
‘individual’ organisms are in reality merely survival vehicles,
designed to protect and propagate the immortal genes that they contain.
In the selfish gene Dawkins also introduced the idea of ‘memes’: self
replicating ideas/ideals/philosophies, which just like genes, compete
against each other in the substrate of human culture. I believe that
understanding the way in which memes and genes influence the universe
is critical to any understanding of the universe. 10/10
|
|
“The Sirens of
Titan”
Kurt Vonnegut
|
I found the
Sirens of Titan to be a devastating book. The reader follows the trials
of Malachi Constant and Beatrice Rumfoord, flawed characters that are
variously manipulated, kidnapped, enslaved and forced to wage war. What
makes the Sirens of Titan so devastating though is that throughout,
Vonnegut hints that the trials of Malachi and Beatrice must have some
broader meaning, though by the end of the book, it becomes painfully
clear that there is no meaning to their journey, which is nothing more
than a series of accidents. Like Vonnegut’s other work, the Sirens of
Titan argues that the only true meaning one can realistically hope for
in life is the love of another human being. 10/10
|
|
“Fahrenheit 451”
Ray Bradbury
|
This classic Ray
Bradbury novel is a riot of colorful imagery and feeling, which
chronicles one man’s growing dissatisfaction with a future dystopia
that forbids intellectualism and especially books, which are considered
to be the source of all unhappiness and dissatisfaction. As the novel
progresses it becomes clear that the shallowness of the dystopian
society has bred a formless and diffuse rage that leads to violence and
drug abuse. It is hard not to see the parallels with contemporary Anglo/American
culture. 9/10
|
|
“Fiasco”
Thomas E. Ricks
|
Thomas Rick’s
‘Fiasco’ is widely considered the most encyclopedic documentation of
the failures of the last Gulf war, and it lives up to this reputation.
However, now that the argument has essentially been won, it all feels a
little dry. I should probably have read this a couple of years
ago. 8/10
|
|
“Rush Limbaugh is
a Big Fat Idiot”
Al Franken
|
Al Franken’s
first political book is a collection of essays and anecdotes written
during Bill Clinton’s presidency and targeting some of the worst
excesses of the American right. This is probably the funniest of
Franken’s political books. Now Al is Minnesota’s senator he can put
these political ideas into action. 9/10
|
|
“These Things I
Know”
Al Franken
|
Al Franken’s fake
self help book is short, but very funny – gently poking fun at our self
improvement culture with very unhelpful ‘advice’. 7/10
|
|
“Deciding the
Next Decider”
Calvin Trillin
|
Calvin’s latest
set of short poems on U.S. politics is just as good as ‘Obliviously On
He Sails’ and ‘A Heckuva Job’. Most of the poems are short, funny and
occasionally deep. Best of all, I managed to get a signed copy from the
strand. 7/10
|
|
“Freakonomics”
Steven Levitt
and Stephen J. Dubner
|
Freakonomics is a
meandering application of economic tools to understand issues such as
cheating, drug dealing, the Ku Klux Klan and the effects of abortion on
crime. Most of the work presented is Levitt’s, though work by other
academics is included. Each chapter follows the basic pattern of
applying data-mining and economic analytics to unusual problems. The
result is very readable and a lot of fun, if not always 100%
convincing. 7/10
|
|
“Leviathan”
Thomas Hobbes
|
Hobbes is often
considered the father of conservative thought. His philosophy hinges on
the idea that humans are primarily self interested and that this leads
naturally to war. To avoid this, Hobbes suggests that individuals
should delegate their moral and ethical reasoning to a benign monarch
or dictator whose rule over the commonwealth, or ‘leviathan’ ensures
peace. What Hobbes overlooks is that centralised powers are equally
likely to go to war, and on an even larger scale. Hobbes views on
religion are similarly contradictory. He identifies the fallibility of
scripture and idiocy of superstition while referring to English
Christianity as the ‘one true religion’. While I found Leviathan
interesting, I could not disagree more with its message. 7/10
|
|
“The Catcher in
the Rye”
J.D. Salinger
|
A fantastic
coming-of-age novel (I wish I’d read it as a teenager) in which the
protagonist, Holden Caulfield, tells the story of his expulsion from
school and his subsequent week spent hiding from his parents in New
York. Along the way, the reader learns more about Holden’s difficult
transition to adult-hood. Along with reminding me of my own teenage
years, I can still associate with Holden’s feelings of being cut adrift
from the world, especially when I travel a lot. 9/10
|
|
“FUBAR: America’s Right Wing Nightmare”
Sam Seder and
Stephen Sherrill
|
This book was a
guilty pleasure! FUBAR digs into the worst of the American right,
exposing just how corrupt and hypocritical the leaders of this group
are (my favorite chapter was the one on gay-hating gay republicans).
FUBAR isn’t reasonable, it isn’t going to convince anyone who didn’t
already agree with it, but it IS hilarious. 8/10
|
|
“The Age of
Turbulence”
Alan Greenspan
|
I read this book
to gain a little insight into the former Federal Reserve Chairman.
Greenspan is lauded in some circles as a genius, who by saved the US economy following the downturn of the early 00’s. I disagree completely. Greenspan
simply built a debt bubble by slashing the base rate (compare growth of
the US economy to borrowing in his tenure). Evaluated as a book, Age of
Turbulence is almost unreadable – Greenspan makes even simple issues
complex. Evaluated as an economic work, I think the book is equally
poor - in the light of the current credit crunch and looming
recessions, Greenspan’s glorification of CDOs and Hedge Funds together
with dismissal of worries over US asset-backed debt seem laughable. 5/10
|
|
“Naked Pictures
of Famous People”
Jon Stewart
|
This is
definitely not ‘America the Book’, where Stewart’s acerbic wit was
turned on an interesting exploration of American democracy. ‘Naked
Pictures of Famous People’ is just the funny, minus the politics, minus
the insight. It’s still great. 7/10
|
|
“Obliviously on
he Sails”
Calvin Trillin
|
Trillin’s first
book of poems about the Bush administration (I had my copy of his second
book signed in NYC a few years back). The poems are mostly short, often
absurd, sometimes touching… and remarkably able to make the unbearable
Bush administration bearable. 8/10
|
|
“The Shock
Doctrine”
Naomi Klein
|
The Shock
Doctrine examines the relationship between free market fundamentalism
and political totalitarianism over the last 40 years. I thought the
book began weakly, equating the ‘creative destruction’ exploited by
neo-liberal economists to the use of physical shock therapy, which didn’t
quite fly for me. What Klein does do brilliantly though is debunk
the mythos that free markets lead to free democracies. Moreover Klein
shows that radical neo-liberal reforms have, as often as not, required
the iron grip of a military junta to enforce. From Chile to Russia, Klein exhaustively documents just how brutally the ‘Washington Consensus’ has been
applied and just how often it has failed. 9/10
|
|
“The Tailor of Panama”
John Le Carré
|
I enjoyed ‘The
Tailor of Panama’ on two levels. At the first level, it provides a
touching study in human weakness. At the second level, it’s a
fascinating story of a spy agency corrupted by incompetence,
self-interest and political lobbying. The story was also prescient. The
story of Panama’s ‘tailor’ is eerily similar to that of ‘curve ball’,
an Iraqi taxi driver who concocted exotic and complex lies for the CIA
that were used in large part to justify the Iraq war. 10/10
|
|
“Meditations”
Marcus Aurelius
|
‘Meditations’ is
a collection of observations, thoughts and quotes from Roman Emperor
Marcus Aurelius, mostly written during his time on the German front.
Marcus was a philosopher of the stoic school and this was my first
exposure to stoic philosophy. I like the stoic’s disdain for ‘free
will’, ambivalence to the idea of gods and also to the question of an
afterlife. However, the stoic’s acceptance of one’s position in the
world as the natural way of things is anathema to me. 8/10
|
|
“The Prince and
the Pauper”
Mark Twain
|
The Prince and
the Pauper is a commentary on life in 1500s England. In a fluke
accident, a beggar switches places with the Prince of Wales, who he has
an uncanny resemblance to. Through Each child’s exploration of the
alien environment into which they are thrust, Twain exposes the
brutality of life for the poor along with the ridiculous excess of the
monarchy. 9/10
|
|
“The Adventures
of
Tom Sawyer”
Mark Twain
|
Written before
the adventures of Huck Finn, the adventures of Tom Sawyer contains less
subtext and commentary on southern society, but does contain a great
tale of childhood adventure… and with less use of dialect too ;-) 8/10
|
|
“Bagombo Snuff
Box”
Kurt Vonnegut
|
This is a
collection of short stories, many of which are pure genius. All of the
stories comment upon society, but what I found interesting in Bagombo
Snuff Box was the breadth of Vonnegut’s work, from overtly sci-fi tales
to more serious commentary on issues like war in “The Cruise of the
Jolly Roger”. 8/10
|
|
“The Adventures
of Huckleberry Finn”
Mark Twain
|
I finished this
book as my train crossed the Mississippi, arriving into New Orleans , which is perhaps the perfect place. Once I got over Twain’s use of
dialect, I enjoyed Huck Finn, from the freedom of the adventure, to the
commentary on racism and superstition in the south, where ‘common
sense’ contrasts sharply with the good instincts of ‘uneducated’ Huck
Finn. 10/10
|
|
“Slaughterhouse
Five”
Kurt Vonnegut
|
This is a
touching and honest book which explores the role of unprepared,
inexperienced youths in the second world war along with the incredible brutality
and devastation that the allied powers unleashed upon their enemies,
particularly through the fire-bombing of Dresden. Vonnegut uses thinly
veiled sci-fi twists and humor to make his presentation of the horror
bearable, and even more human. No writer I have read, except perhaps
Howard Zinn has spoken so powerfully against war itself. Sadly, this
generation of writers will not be with us much longer, as shown by
Vonnegut’s passing. 10/10
|
|
“The World is
Flat”
Thomas L.
Friedman
|
By the
‘flattening of the world’ Friedman is referring to increasing global
integration and trade. The book does a fair job of evangelizing
globalization, and does give a nod towards the short and medium-term
disruptive effects that it may lead to. Unfortunately, Friedman’s
analysis is shallow, often relying on anecdotal evidence and encounters
and in some areas (for example his rhapsodizing about eBay member
feedback) becomes absurdly utopian. 6/10
|
|
“The Liberal
Economy”
Adair Turner
|
Turner advocates
pretty standard neo-liberal economic policies in this book – i.e. trade
liberalization and specialization abroad and European-style social
policies at home. The material is similar in tone to writers such as
Tom Freidman or Tim Harford. Unfortunately, Turner is even less mindful
of the potential problems that globalization may cause, and the book is
much more difficult to read while adding little additional depth. 4/10
|
|
“A Man Without a
Country”
Kurt Vonnegut
|
A man without a
country explores Kurt Vonnegut’s feelings towards the human race, and America in particular during the twilight of his life. The central thesis of the book is
that the human race will not survive and that it does not deserve too.
Vonnegut’s outlook on America is similarly bleak… and to a large extent
I agree. Despite the dark tone of the central theme, this is balanced
throughout by Vonnegut’s obvious fondness for the human animal – warts
and all. 8/10
|
|
“The Pearl”
John Steinbeck
|
On its face, ‘the
pearl’ is a touching story about a native family who’s simple lives are
ruined when good fortune hands them a prize that is coveted by their
colonial masters. However, I like to think that ‘the pearl’ can also be
seen as a parable about how the discovery of natural wealth (e.g. oil,
diamonds or uranium) can destroy the life-style of indigenous peoples,
who often gain little from the exploitation of these resources. 9/10
|
|
“Perilous Power”
Noam Chomsky
&
Gilbert Achcar
|
‘Perilous Power’
is an edited transcription of conversations between Chomsky and Achcar
that touches on subjects including: terrorism and conspiracy,
fundamentalism and democracy, wars in the middle east and the
Israel/Palestine conflict. While this is a fascinating book, the
breadth of subjects tackled means that if one is familiar with
Chomsky’s positions (which are largely shared by Achar) there is very
little new material. 7/10
|
|
“East of Eden”
John Steinbeck
|
East of Eden
explores family relationships and morality through the lens of a two
generation re-telling of the story of Caine and Abel. Rather than
competing for God’s affection, the sons in East of Eden are competing
for the affection of their father as they battle against what they
perceive is their inherited moral character. Like all great books East
of Eden makes one reflect one’s own life. 10/10
|
|
“God Bless You
Dr. Kevorkian”
Kurt Vonnegut
|
This short volume
is a transcription of a collection of short interviews for New York’s public radio station, in which Vonnegut is repeatedly killed and resurrected in
order to interview the dead. I find something quite beautiful, but
difficult to describe about Vonnegut’s writing… so difficult in fact
that I won’t try. 9/10
|
|
“The Undercover
Economist”
Tim Harford
|
This was a
fascinating book, which seeks to explain the appeal and power of
economics to ‘regular people’. Harford makes a compelling case for free
markets and neo-liberal economic policies, although I feel that he
should have spent more exploring the extent to which neo-liberal
institutions such as the world bank actually implement an even
handed globalization policy. I also feel that more discussion was
needed on how the disruptive effects of globalization (e.g. the current
spike in food prices due to the use of bio-fuels) can be mitigated for
the poor. 8/10
|
|
“The Cost of
Living”
Arundhati Roy
|
This pair of
short essays by Arundhati Roy exploring the impact of big dam building
in India and expressing her reaction to India’s acquisition of the
nuclear bomb. I found that the former provided great insight into
Indian culture and specifically the growing divide between India’s traditional villages and rapidly developing cities. I was somewhat less convinced
by Roy’s second essay on India’s acquisition of the nuclear bomb. 7/10
|
|
“The Book of
Mormon”
Joseph Smith
|
Supposedly
discovered by Joseph Smith after a visit from the angel Moroni, the book of Mormon claims to be another testament of Jesus Christ. Amongst some of
the odder content is the idea that Jesus Christ lived in America and that Native Americans are a lost tribe of Israel. The book of Mormon also speaks
frequently about a large European church that is a tool of the devil
(the Catholic church?). And (more interestingly) speaks out against
those who Joseph Smith no doubt saw as competitors – deists and
humanists who venerate democracy over religion (Tom Paine?). Any
laudable ideas that the book of Mormon does contain are lifted directly
from the new testament. As such, I found the book of Mormon interesting
only as a study in how scripture is created by religious figures in
order to affect control and spread their ideologies. 2/10
|
|
“A Power
Governments Cannot Suppress”
Howard Zinn
|
The common thread
that runs through this collection of essays is the idea that people
rather than governments have been responsible for the positive advances
in our society - from the abolition of slavery to the civil rights
movement, Zinn exposes how individuals, rather than governments, have
fought and won important rights. This, in turn, exposes how the modern
education and indoctrination system too often presents our modern
rights as ‘gifts’ bestowed by benevolent government. 8/10
|
|
“Interventions”
Noam Chomsky
|
‘Interventions’
is a collection of Chomsky’s essays that have appeared in the printed
press around the world (Chomsky’s op-ed pieces are largely boycotted by
the U.S. press). As I only read the financial press, this work was
entirely new to me, and like most of Chomsky’s work was insightful and
prescient. Unfortunately, because this is a selection of previously
separate works there is substantial repetition across the essays. 7/10
|
|
“The Audacity of
Hope”
Barak Obama
|
I think that
reading writers on the extremes of the political spectrum, from Hayek
to Marx has spoiled my enjoyment of books from current politicians.
While I have a lot of respect for Barak Obama and believe that it is
critical he wins the 2008 election, I found the Audacity of Hope
calculatingly centrist even on issues as polarizing as the death
penalty. 6/10
|
|
“Screwed: The
Undeclared War Against the Middle Class”
Thom Hartmann
|
Tom Hartmann
convincingly makes the argument that since the enactment of Reaganomics
in the early 1980s, successive US administrations have weakened the U.S. middle-class and rolled-back hard-won social programs to the detriment of both
democracy and the wider economy. While I agree with Thom’s carefully
researched positions, I found that this book was a little dry and
didn’t add much to the material that I have heard on Thom’s radio show
over the last two years. 7/10
|
|
“Baghdad Burning”
RiverBend
|
The book version
of a young Iraqi girl’s blog, Baghdad Burning spans the period from the
beginning of the occupation to shortly before the 2004 U.S. election. Sadly, the book confirms from the inside that we have brought the worst kind
of devastation, chaos and corruption to Iraq. RiverBend’s fate may not
have been as bad as some in Iraq – her family escaped after the
publication of this book. Nevertheless, there is something very moving
in reading about the day-to-day struggles of a middle-class Iraqi
family very much like my own. My only complaint about this book is that
it had obviously been rather hastily transcribed from the blog. 8/10
|
|
“Breakfast of
Champions”
Kurt Vonnegut
|
This is the first
of Kurt Vonnegut’s books that I’ve read. It’s a collection of the
author’s observations and thoughts on society wrapped in a slightly
science-fiction narrative. It’s dark, funny and insightful. I look
forward to reading some more Kurt Vonnegut. 9/10
|
|
“The Age of
Reason”
Thomas Paine
|
In The Age of
Reason, Paine advocates revolution against organized religion just as
he did against monarchy and corrupt government. Unfortunately for
Paine, Christianity proved itself more brutal and repressive than any
of his previous adversaries and the publication of this book led to
imprisonment in France and disfavor in America. The Age of Reason is
not an atheistic text, but rather it captures Paine’s own deistic
beliefs and contrasts them against the absurd dogma of organized
religion. For me, this is Paine’s best work. 9/10
|
|
“I am America and so Can You”
Stephen Colbert
|
Whether on his TV
show or in this book, Colbert’s portrayal of an egomaniacal,
ill-informed, blow-hard pundit is always spot on. His character
perfectly embodies everything that is wrong with the U.S punditocracy.
Among those who Colbert sets his sights on are homosexuals, the elderly
and ‘university elites’. Through the deliberate comedy of his own
arguments Colbert reflects and magnifies the stupidity of real pundits
like Bill O’Reilly, laying them low while always professing to agree
with them. 8/10
|
|
“The Rights of
Man”
Thomas Paine
|
Paine wrote ‘The
Rights of Man’ in response to Burke’s condemnation of the French
revolution, which compared the young republic unfavorably with Britain’s semi-monarchical system. The first part of Rights of Man is a solid defense of
the revolution, while the second contains Paine’s thoughts on improving
the British system. My enjoyment of this book was tempered throughout
by the knowledge that the revolution Paine longed for would unfortunately
never happen in Britain. 8/10
|
|
“Long Walk to
Freedom”
Nelson Mandela
|
This
autobiography of Nelson Mandela is touching and inspiring. Throughout
the book, Mandela paints himself, not as the extraordinary man that he
is, but as a simple man who could not tolerate the injustice he saw
around him and so did whatever he could, whenever he could to change
the world for the better. 9/10
|
|
“The Crisis
Papers”
Thomas Paine
|
Following the
success of Common Sense, Paine joined Washington’s army in a position
approximating that of chief propagandist. While his cause was better than
that of Goebbles, Paine wrote the crisis papers in a conscious attempt
to rally public opinion to the revolutionary cause. Pain wrote 15
crisis papers in all, which provide an interesting summary of the war
from an American perspective. Despite the goodness of his cause, the
feeling of hidden calculation seeps through Paine’s war-time propaganda
making it somehow less satisfying than his earlier work. 7/10
|
|
“Common Sense”
Thomas Paine
|
Tom Paine wrote
Common Sense from the perspective of a layman enamored with the idea of
American independence just prior to the revolutionary war, and Common
Sense greatly helped popularize that cause. This short book is a
straight forward call-to-arms and is touching in its directness.
Reading Paine, it’s easy to see how ideas like limited government and
free enterprise became so deeply embedded in the American psyche, when
an overbearing British monarch oppressed the colonies using taxation as
a weapon. Despite this, I think Paine would be saddened by some of the
arguments of modern U.S. conservatives, particularly those who argue
for the so called ‘unitary executive’. 9/10
|
|
“Absolute
Friends”
John Le Carré
|
A brilliant book,
which follows two quite different characters, each of whom is slowly
sucked into the world of espionage, as though it’s the most natural
thing in the world. From the Vietnam-era to the tail-end of the cold
war, to the current mess in Iraq. Neither can escape being sucked back
in again and again, with eventually tragic results. I think this book
has some very interesting things to say about how truly decent people
can be used by ideologues. 10/10
|
|
“Jarhead”
Anthony
Swofford
|
This book is a
war diary from a U.S. Marine Sniper during the first Gulf War. The book
feels as though it does a brutally honest job of communicating the
culture of the USMC, the experience of modern warfare and the
soldier’s-eye-view of the politics of war. 8/10
|
|
“The God
Delusion”
Richard Dawkins
|
It’s rare for me
to read a book which re-aligns my world view, but this was such a book.
Throughout this book, Dawkins forces one to examine one’s views,
clarifying fuzzy thinking on these issues and helping one better
understand the role that religious indoctrination plays in all our
lives. The book crystallized my view that faith in the supernatural is
at best stupid and at worst dangerous. Moreover it captured the
inherent beauty of atheism, that we are not the product of some divine
tinkering, but rather the most complex known expression of the
universe’s inherent beauty. 10/10
|
|
“McLibel: Burger
Culture on Trial”
John Vidal
|
A good summary of
the events that led to the prosecution of David Morris and Helen Steel
for distributing leaflets critical to McDonalds and the subsequent
libel trial. This book, like the trial tries to cover a lot of issues,
but it can do so with no real depth. Despite this, the book does a good
job of exposing the cultural gulf between corporations and activists
and exposing the absurdity of British libel laws. 6/10
|
|
“Catch 22”
Joseph Heller
|
Catch 22 is a
glorious, pompous and vain book. A funny, dark and hopeful book. Why am
I writing like this? You’ll understand if you’ve read the book.
Personally, I started out hating Heller’s writing, with it’s oddball
but obvious humor and bizarre and indulgent dialogue, but in a way this
perfectly mirrors the senselessness of the subject-matter and as the
book wore on, I grew attached to the characters, which one by one lost
their lives. Catch 22 has a lot of deep things to say on subjects such
as courage, cowardice, heroes and villains. Well worth a read. 8/10
|
|
“Anthony and
Cleopatra”
William
Shakespeare
|
I’m not a huge
Shakespeare fan, but I was particularly interested to read Anthony and
Cleopatra as I’m quite into the TV show Rome, which is about to
enter this era of history. It looks like Vorenus will play the role of
Shakespeare’s ‘Servius’, though it’s pretty hard to imagine quite the
same romantic tragedy being played out on Rome*. 7/10
* I was quite
wrong, they followed the plot of Anthony and Cleopatra closely
|
|
“The First Men in
the Moon”
H.G. Wells
|
One of the lesser
known H.G. Wells’ stories, but also one of the most cinematic - at
times feeling like a 19th century action movie. Just as he
did in the time-machine, Wells once again uses exotic circumstances to
explore our own culture and character. 9/10
|
|
“War of the
Worlds”
H.G. Wells
|
A great story,
and never really done justice by the films made of it. I think what I
like the most is that there are really no heroes, all of the main
characters are realistically flawed, but even more so, by comparing the
Martian conquest of earth with man’s conquest of the animal kingdom,
Wells again poses uncomfortable questions about our own behaviour. 10/10
|
|
“The Island of Dr. Moreau”
H.G. Wells
|
It seems to me
that each of H.G. Wells’ stories offers a warning, in the case of The
Time-Machine, he warns against the degeneration of society due to easy
living and in this case, he warns against uninhibited scientific
meddling with nature, but even more interesting to me, through the
concept of the beast people – merely animals made to look human, he
explores our treatment of animals 10/10
|
|
“The Time
Machine”
H.G. Wells
|
One of the
classics of Sci-Fi, in which Wells uses the Eloi to explore the potentially
negative consequences of society’s drive towards efficiency and
easy-living. Wells speculates how over time, without struggle or
hardship to spur him on, man might degenerate into a pale impression of
his former self. 10/10
|
|
“I, Robot”
Isaac Asimov
|
A collection of
short stories centered on Isaac Asimov’s three laws of robotics.
Sometimes interesting, sometimes samey. 6/10
|
|
“The Godfather”
Mario Puzo
|
A good book, to
which the film is very faithful. It’s easy to see how it won the best
adapted screenplay Oscar. 8/10
|
|
“The Universe in
a Nutshell”
Stephen Hawking
|
Hawking addresses
everything from Star Trek to genetic engineering, touching on
metaphysics and philosophy as he explores the limits of what we know
about the universe. I have to say it gets a little over my head when
the discussion turns to p-branes and 11 dimensional universes, but good
nonetheless. 8/10
|
|
“Air America – The Playbook”
Various
|
Air America – The Playbook is a collection of essays, cartoons and show excerpts from the Air
America Radio Network. I’d recommend this book if you’ve listened to a
lot of AAR as I have and want to be reminded of some of its finer
moments. If you’re expecting a lot of in-depth new material though, you
may be disappointed. 7/10
|
|
“Neoconservatism”
Edited by Irwin
Stelzer
|
This book is
written by neo-conservatives in an effort to explain their beliefs. The
collection of essays varies significantly in quality, but seems like a
good overview. A number of things struck me: Firstly, neoconservatives
evaluate their success in purely perceptive terms, whether it is
foreign policy, or domestic - as illustrated by Kelling and Wilson’s
*bizarre* essay on why the police shouldn’t focus on solving crimes!
Secondly, as much as they equivocate and explain, neo-conservatism is
just as scary as it first appears. 7/10
|
|
“Fear and
Loathing in Las Vegas”
Hunter S.
Thomson
|
Thomson went to
Vegas to cover the Mint 400 motorbike race and after a week-long drug
rampage came back with a modern classic - crazy, fun and uncomfortably
reminiscent of my own lowest moments. 10/10
|
|
“Failed States”
Noam Chomsky
|
Chomsky’s latest
explores the question of whether the U.S. demonstrates similar
properties to the ‘failed states’ in which it deems the right to
intervene. As usual Chomsky is unsurpassed at presenting an unvarnished
view of recent history and as such I found the early chapters a little
depressing, though the after-word in particular inspires hope. 10/10
|
|
“Heckuva Job”
Calvin Trillin
|
This book is
Trillin’s second collection of poems about the Bush administration.
Calvin’s poems are short, simple and funny and this makes them all the
more powerful when they strike a nerve, which they often do. I was
lucky enough to see Calvin live on the Daily Show and then at a reading
in the Strand book store in New York City where I got my copy signed. 8/10
|
|
“You Can’t be
Neutral on a Moving Train”
Howard Zinn
|
A political
biography of historian and activist Howard Zinn and his involvement
with the US civil rights and anti-war movement. I can’t understand how
anyone can find Zinn depressing, I found this book moving and full of
hope. 9/10
|
|
“The Wars Against
Saddam”
John Simpson
|
A very
interesting and well written book, which feels, throughout un-political
and personal. Probably the best thing that I’ve read on the Iraq wars. 9/10
|
|
“Ride with Bin
Laden”
Bill Maher
|
This book takes
looks at how normal U.S. citizens can help in the ‘war on terror’ and
how culture has changed from the time of the second world war when
governments were willing to ask for sacrifice from their citizens. It’s
a little more serious than I was expecting from Bill Maher, who’s show
‘Real Time’ is more comedic. Nevertheless, an interesting read. 7/10
|
|
“The Truth, With
Jokes.”
Al Franken
|
This book follows
on from “Lies and the Lying Liars that Tell them” and looks at how
dishonesty, hypocrisy and even criminal activity were used by the
American right to win the 2004 election. Unfortunately, compared to
Lies, this book is a lot less fun. Also, if you listen to Franken’s
radio show, you’ll also have heard a lot of this material before. 6/10
|
|
“Faster, They’re
Gaining”
Peter
Biddlecombe
|
A slightly
unusual travel-book which recounts the author’s experiences as he
travels to exotic places courtesy of his expense account. The book is
an interesting and honest description of the author’s experiences (most
of which center around booze). The only problem is that the author is a
very unlikable character. Nevertheless it’s a fun and worthwhile read. 7/10
|
|
“Keep the
Aspidistra Flying”
George Orwell
|
This book follows
a struggling poet who is trying to escape the prison of a ‘good job’.
During Gordon’s self-imposed poverty, the aspidistra becomes a symbol
for everything that he believes is wrong with lower-middle class
Britain, which he sees as more concerned with keeping up appearances
than living life, which in his own way is exactly what Gordon does. 8/10
|
|
“Confessions of
an Economic Hitman”
John Perkins
|
I was looking
forward to this book, written by a former servant of the World Bank and
US-driven corporatism. While it contains some interesting information,
it is nauseatingly romanticized, self-aggrandizing and shallow. What
else should I have expected? 5/10
|
|
“The Road to
Serfdom”
Friedrich Hayek
|
A scathing and
thought-provoking attack on collectivism. Hayek argues convincingly
that centralization and planned economies naturally foster
totalitarianism. Somewhat less convincingly, Hayek attributes all of
the virtues of society to individualism. 7/10
|
|
“Coming Up For
Air”
George Orwell
|
George Bowling
reflects on the changes he has seen in England since the first world
war and the changes that he fears the next war will bring. George tries
to retreat into the past, but modern life and RAF bombers conspire to
make this impossible. 9/10
|
|
“Past Mortem”
Ben Elton
|
I bought this
book on impulse at Liverpool Airport. Its well written, with a solid
plot, but Elton’s supposedly ‘brilliant’ detective is unbelievably
dense and most readers will work out who the killer is long before he
has finished his sputtering journey in that direction. 7/10
|
|
“The Communist
Manifesto”
K. Marx &
F. Engles
|
I should have
read this a long time ago. The problems this document exposes in modern
society are undeniable and just as relevant today as when the document
was written, however, the proposed response of a centrally controlled
economy and society is, with hindsight, equally flawed. 8/10
|
|
“A Clergyman’s
Daughter”
George Orwell
|
Another sad
Orwell novel. The story is about a rector’s daughter who loses her
memory and eventually her faith, yet decides to pretend she still has
it. I wonder if he has ever written a book that could be called happy? 8/10
|
|
“House of Bush,
House of Saud”
Craig Unger
|
This is a
detailed and responsible look at the relationship between the U.S. and Saudi Arabia . It is particularly successful at laying bare the influences that
have led to the unlikely alliances we see today. Though Unger
occasionally slips into partisan sniping. 7/10
|
|
“Burmese Days”
George Orwell
|
A sad book about
an out-of-place Englishman in a small town in colonial Burma. Increasingly alienated from the English establishment, the protagonist (Flory)
latches on to a new arrival, a young Englishwoman. He is unable to see
that she is just a part of the establishment that he abhors and as
things fall apart, he kills himself. 9/10
|
|
“Animal Farm”
George Orwell
|
I started reading
this at 3AM, thinking that I’d read a few pages before bed, bit I
couldn’t stop. I ended up reading it all. Light reading, but still a
classic. 9/10
|
|
“Wilt in Nowhere”
Tom Sharpe
|
A fairly good
book which is laugh-out-loud funny in some parts, though certainly not
what I’d have expected from Britain’s ‘funniest living writer’ as the
blurbs gushed. 7/10
|
|
“How Mumbo Jumbo
Conquered the World”
Francis Wheen
|
It’s easy to get
swept up in Wheen’s impassioned tirade, however, the ease with which
Wheen dismembers ‘mumbo jumbo’ is often achieved through outright
dishonesty. Wheen tends to simplify the arguments of his opponents to
the point where they bear little or no resemblance to their original
form and are thus easily refuted. 6/10
|
|
“Fateful
Triangle”
Noam Chomsky
|
This book looks
at the modern relationship between the U.S., Israel and Palestine. Chomsky takes three basic principles: Universality, brutal intellectual honesty
and rigorous research to explore subjects in ways that would be
unimaginable in the ‘main-stream’. 8/10
|
|
“Why Not Me?”
Al Franken
|
This book follows
Al Franken’s fictional 2000 presidential campaign. It’s a slow starter
but once Franken warms up, it’s a laugh a minute, particularly the
tormenting of Al Gore by Franken’s alcoholic brother. 8/10
|
|
“The Fahrenheit
9/11 Reader”
Michael Moore
|
This is an
unusual book, divided into five sections; the ‘screenplay’ of F9/11,
supporting evidence, reviews, letters to Moore and related articles.
The supporting articles really shore up, what I previously thought,
were some of the weaker elements of F9/11. 7/10
|
|
“Monstrous
Regiment”
Terry Pratchett
|
I thought this
was a pretty average Disc World book. It was a fun read with lots of
parallels with what’s going on in our own world; however, I thought
that some of the blurbs calling it Pratchett’s ‘best work’ were
overblown. 7/10
|
|
“Going to the
Wars”
Max Hastings
|
A great book by
war reporter Max Hastings. It describes some of his adventures and
misadventures in various theaters of war. The authors changing views on
subjects such as Israel and his own character (or lack thereof) are
particularly interesting. 8/10
|
|
“Red Dragon”
Thomas Harris
|
I enjoyed red
dragon more than silence but not as much as Hannibal. Interestingly
that places my order of the preference for the books exactly the
opposite of my order of preference for the films. 7/10
|
|
“Sharpe’s Sword”
Bernard
Cornwell
|
A good quality
military romp, though not that distinctive. 6/10
|
|
“The Silence of
the Lambs”
Thomas Harris
|
Though
(ironically) the strongest film in the series ‘Silence of the Lambs’ is
not as strong in book form. The reason for this is that the most
interesting character, Dr. Lecter remains largely unexplored. 6/10
|
|
“Not on the
Label”
Felicity Lawrence
|
This book is an
expose of the production methods and politics of the UK food industry. It’s a poor relation to Eric Schlosser’s “Fast Food Nation”, which covers
the same subject in a more entertaining and detailed way; though it was
interesting to see that migrant worker issues are just as important in UK farming. 6/10
|
|
“Hannibal”
Thomas Harris
|
The book was far
better than the film version, which I though was the weakest of the
trilogy. You really get into the unique characters and there’s a
satisfying departure from Hollywood happy-endings. 8/10
|
|
“Hegemony or
Survival”
Noam Chomsky
|
A solid
indictment of modern US foreign policy. Each page is a reference manual
of valuable information. 8/10
|
|
“1984”
George Orwell
|
This book is just
as prescient as everyone says, particularly given the current attempts
being made to blur the line between fact and opinion. 8/10
|
|
“The Curious
Incident of the Dog in the Nighttime”
Mark Haddon
|
This is a clever
and funny book, though I think it’s really intended for a younger
audience than me. It’s told from the point of view of a child with
special needs/abilities. 8/10
|
|
“Lies and the
Lying Liars that Tell Them”
Al Franken
|
Yet another great
book; Franken systematically disembowels the lies of right-wing pundits
one by one. It’s shocking but laugh-out-loud funny all the way through.
9/10
|